{"id":41588,"date":"2024-10-22T10:04:29","date_gmt":"2024-10-22T15:04:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/?p=41588"},"modified":"2024-10-22T18:23:55","modified_gmt":"2024-10-22T23:23:55","slug":"cub-urges-icc-to-cut-ameren-rate-hike-request","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/blog\/2024\/10\/22\/cub-urges-icc-to-cut-ameren-rate-hike-request\/","title":{"rendered":"CUB Urges ICC to Cut Ameren Rate-Hike Request"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-38665\" src=\"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ICC-rate-hike-approvals-chicago-1-300x169.png\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ICC-rate-hike-approvals-chicago-1-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ICC-rate-hike-approvals-chicago-1-800x450.png 800w, https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ICC-rate-hike-approvals-chicago-1-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ICC-rate-hike-approvals-chicago-1-958x539.png 958w, https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ICC-rate-hike-approvals-chicago-1.png 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/20241022-Ameren-Electric-Proposed-Order.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pushed back on a recommendation by state regulatory judges<\/a><\/strong> that the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) grant Ameren Illinois an electric rate hike of $315 million, saying the judges had overlooked key examples of overspending by the utility.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Proposed Order, submitted\u00a0on Oct. 8\u00a0by three ICC Administrative Law Judges, granted the utility more than 90 percent of the $334 million Ameren had requested. On Tuesday, CUB planned to file a brief asking the ICC to take a stronger stance to protect customers from unnecessary Ameren spending.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Proposed Order is disappointing, given the fact that CUB had identified roughly $100 million in overcharges in the utility\u2019s original request,\u201d CUB Executive Director Sarah Moskowitz said. \u201cWe urge the five-member ICC to hold Ameren accountable, remove wasteful spending and slash Ameren\u2019s rate hike.\u201d<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Take action:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/secure.everyaction.com\/ceNK1G-7_0G18ga1hzfKNg2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Sign CUB&#8217;s petition against reckless electric utility spending.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc.illinois.gov\/docket\/P2024-0238\/public-comments\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>File a public comment with the ICC.\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The ICC is scheduled to make a final ruling on the case <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc.illinois.gov\/docket\/P2024-0238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>(Docket 24-0238)<\/strong> <\/a>before the end of the year. The five commissioners can follow the proposed order or adjust the rate hike up or down, as they see fit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the latest development in a dramatic series of events dating back to last December, when the ICC slashed the company\u2019s proposed rate-hike request and rejected the utility\u2019s plan for updating the power grid. Commissioners said Ameren\u00a0had failed to prove that the plan would be affordable for consumers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Earlier this year, Ameren refiled its grid plan as well as a multi-year plan for raising rates. After some adjustments over the course of the case, Ameren is now proposing to raise rates by $334 million through 2027.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In August, CUB filed testimony identifying about $100 million in overcharges in Ameren\u2019s proposed rate hike. CUB identified hundreds of millions of dollars in wasteful or improper spending proposed by Ameren, with a portion to be recovered through the current rate-hike request, and the rest recovered over decades to come. A summary of key parts of CUB\u2019s testimony:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) requires a showing of cost-effectiveness for each project included in Ameren\u2019s grid plan. But Ameren only applied cost-benefit analysis to projects representing roughly one-fifth of total costs, CUB argued. The watchdog proposed to require Ameren to calculate benefits for every project it can and compare that to costs. Projects would only be approved if benefits exceed costs, or if they\u2019re strictly legally or practically required.<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CEJA requires that delivery service rates be affordable. But Ameren\u00a0misled\u00a0about its huge rate-hike request by comparing delivery service rate increases to total electric bills, or even total household energy costs (including volatile heating gas costs).\u00a0CUB argued that by dividing the relevant number by a larger category of costs, the utility made its proposed rate hike look smaller than it actually was and tried\u00a0to skirt CEJA. CUB proposed\u00a0that the ICC compare apples to apples and, if delivery service rates under the proposed grid plans would grow too fast relative to forecasted inflation, decrease Ameren\u2019s rate hike accordingly\u00a0to slow the rate of spending.<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CUB urged\u00a0regulators to make utility shareholders, not customers, foot Ameren\u2019s $2.8 million bill for outside law firms and consultants to argue in favor of the utilities\u2019 grid plans after their first attempt was deemed inadequate by the ICC last December.<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CUB recommended the\u00a0rejection of three projects totaling more than $9 million that Ameren insists do not need a cost-benefit analysis because they are necessary. (The utility does not substantiate what this urgent need is.)<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CUB called on\u00a0the ICC to reject roughly $23.5 million for six projects in which the calculated benefits do not clearly exceed costs.<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CUB proposed\u00a0disallowing about $800,000 in operations and maintenance expenditures the utility has failed to demonstrate it expects to actually incur.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cUnder CEJA, the days of spending money first, answering questions later are over,\u201d CUB General Counsel Eric DeBellis said \u201cThe law says that electric utilities need to prove their case that each investment of ratepayers\u2019 money is strictly necessary, yields real, tangible benefits to ratepayers that exceed costs, or both. We as consumer advocates are fighting to rein in Ameren as it tries to play fast and loose with consumers\u2019 money.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Over the last two years, Ameren Illinois\u2019 parent company has made more than $2.2 billion in profits. In addition to\u00a0its latest rate increase it received of roughly $150 million,\u00a0the Illinois utility has received two other electric rate hikes in recent years: $57.6 million in January 2022 and $61 million in January 2023).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ameren Illinois serves about 1.2 million electric customers in Central and Southern Illinois.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) pushed back on a recommendation by state regulatory judges that the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) grant Ameren Illinois an electric rate hike of $315 million, saying the judges had overlooked key examples of overspending by the utility. The Proposed Order, submitted\u00a0on Oct. 8\u00a0by three ICC Administrative Law Judges, granted the utility more than 90 percent of the $334 million Ameren had requested. On Tuesday, CUB planned to file a brief asking the ICC to take a stronger stance to protect customers from unnecessary Ameren spending. \u201cThe Proposed Order is disappointing, given the fact that CUB had identified roughly $100 million in overcharges in the utility\u2019s original request,\u201d CUB Executive Director Sarah Moskowitz said. \u201cWe urge the five-member ICC to hold Ameren accountable, remove wasteful spending and slash Ameren\u2019s rate hike.\u201d Take action: Sign CUB&#8217;s petition against reckless electric utility spending. File a public comment with the ICC.\u00a0 The ICC is scheduled to make a final ruling on the case (Docket 24-0238) before the end of the year. The five commissioners can follow the proposed order or adjust the rate hike up or down, as they see fit. This is the latest development in a dramatic series of events dating back to last December, when the ICC slashed the company\u2019s proposed rate-hike request and rejected the utility\u2019s plan for updating the power grid. Commissioners said Ameren\u00a0had failed to prove that the plan would be affordable for consumers. Earlier this year, Ameren refiled its grid plan as well as a multi-year plan for raising rates. After some adjustments over the course of the case, Ameren is now proposing to raise rates by $334 million through 2027. In August, CUB filed testimony identifying about $100 million in overcharges in Ameren\u2019s proposed rate hike. CUB identified hundreds of millions of dollars in wasteful or improper spending proposed by Ameren, with a portion to be recovered through the current rate-hike request, and the rest recovered over decades to come. A summary of key parts of CUB\u2019s testimony: The Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) requires a showing of cost-effectiveness for each project included in Ameren\u2019s grid plan. But Ameren only applied cost-benefit analysis to projects representing roughly one-fifth of total costs, CUB argued. The watchdog proposed to require Ameren to calculate benefits for every project it can and compare that to costs. Projects would only be approved if benefits exceed costs, or if they\u2019re strictly legally or practically required. CEJA requires that delivery service rates be affordable. But Ameren\u00a0misled\u00a0about its huge rate-hike request by comparing delivery service rate increases to total electric bills, or even total household energy costs (including volatile heating gas costs).\u00a0CUB argued that by dividing the relevant number by a larger category of costs, the utility made its proposed rate hike look smaller than it actually was and tried\u00a0to skirt CEJA. CUB proposed\u00a0that the ICC compare apples to apples and, if delivery service rates under the proposed grid plans would grow too fast relative to forecasted inflation, decrease Ameren\u2019s rate hike accordingly\u00a0to slow the rate of spending. CUB urged\u00a0regulators to make utility shareholders, not customers, foot Ameren\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_wpscppro_dont_share_socialmedia":null,"_wpscppro_custom_social_share_image":0,"_facebook_share_type":"default","_twitter_share_type":"default","_linkedin_share_type":"default","_pinterest_share_type":"default","_linkedin_share_type_page":"","_instagram_share_type":"default","_medium_share_type":"","_threads_share_type":"","_google_business_share_type":"","_selected_social_profile":[],"_wpsp_enable_custom_social_template":false,"_wpsp_social_scheduling":{"enabled":false,"datetime":null,"platforms":[],"status":"template_only","dateOption":"today","timeOption":"now","customDays":"","customHours":"","customDate":"","customTime":"","schedulingType":"absolute"},"_wpsp_active_default_template":true},"categories":[302,783,1176],"tags":[1032,207,1530],"class_list":["post-41588","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ameren","category-cub-battles","category-electric-rates","tag-ameren-illinois","tag-illinois-commerce-commission","tag-rate-hike-request"],"cp_meta_data":{"_facebook_share_type":["default"],"_twitter_share_type":["default"],"_linkedin_share_type":["default"],"_pinterest_share_type":["default"],"_instagram_share_type":["default"],"classic-editor-remember":["classic-editor"],"_edit_lock":["1729639368:5"],"_edit_last":["5"],"_wp_page_template":["default"],"borntogive_page_header_show_hide":["2"],"borntogive_pages_title_show":["1"],"borntogive_pages_Choose_slider_display":["2"],"borntogive_pages_select_revolution_from_list":["3"],"borntogive_pages_slider_pagination":["yes"],"borntogive_pages_slider_auto_slide":["yes"],"borntogive_pages_slider_direction_arrows":["yes"],"borntogive_pages_slider_effects":["fade"],"borntogive_pages_body_bg_wide":["0"],"borntogive_pages_body_bg_repeat":["repeat"],"borntogive_pages_content_bg_wide":["0"],"borntogive_pages_content_bg_repeat":["repeat"],"borntogive_pages_social_show":["1"],"borntogive_strict_no_sidebar":["0"],"borntogive_sidebar_columns_layout":["3"],"borntogive_gallery_slider_pagination":["yes"],"borntogive_gallery_slider_auto_slide":["yes"],"borntogive_gallery_slider_direction_arrows":["yes"],"borntogive_gallery_slider_effects":["fade"],"_wpb_vc_js_status":["false"],"_wpscppro_custom_social_share_image":[""],"_wpscppro_dont_share_socialmedia":["off"],"_wpsp_is_facebook_share":["off"],"_wpsp_is_twitter_share":["off"],"_wpsp_is_linkedin_share":["off"],"_wpsp_is_pinterest_share":["off"],"_selected_social_profile":["a:0:{}"],"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":["302"],"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":["30"],"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":["4"],"_wpb_post_custom_layout":["default"]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41588","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41588"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41588\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41611,"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41588\/revisions\/41611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41588"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41588"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.citizensutilityboard.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41588"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}